雅思大作文：it is irrational to forbid the animal products
雅思大作文题目：In modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products, for instance, clothing and medicines. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience.
With the advance of the technology, a colossal number of animal products can be replaced by artificial or synthetic elements in the modern society. As a result, many people claim that there is no longer necessary to consume animals to produce any food, clothing, and medicines. But I personally believe such opinion is invalid.
At no circumstance, can the animal products be replaced. First of all, human body cannot depart from meat, since our muscles is built by absorbing the protein coming from meat. And a huge number of necessary nutrition which is crucial to maintain our whole physical system also come animal food products. Thus, without meat, there would be negative effects on our health. In addition, abandoning all the animal products will definitely curb the augment of the economy. More specifically, ifthe market does not consume the animal products any more, animal husbandry would be totally destroyed, generating the unemployment of hundreds of thousands of farmers, then relatively, social instability would appear and the economy would collapse. Clearly, it is irrational to forbid the animal products.
However, some people argue that human beings have the obligation to stop use any animal products as the technology has way developed than before so that the substitution of animal products can be easily found. Unfortunately, such advocate fail to recognize the reality that many animal products, especially some medicines, cannot be replaced. Furthermore, these people do not distinguish the concept between animal preservation and animal products consumption. In other words, to abandon the animal products is not the best way to protect the animal.
In conclusion, it is to early to abandon all the animal products, regardless of the valid alternatives resulting from the advance of the technology. And accordingly, the averages should understand that rejecting any animal products dose not stand for the animal protection.