在托福考试中，综合写作部分是对考生阅读和听力能力的归纳总结。在托福综合写作中，我们需要关注到听力和阅读等等多方面能力累积。那么，在以下内容中，我们就为大家详细介绍一下托福综合写作的三大技巧。
托福综合写作技巧1：用词准确，逻辑清晰
托福作文对于语言的要求圆圆低于对文章内容和结构的要求，托福考试对考生提出的要求只是用完整的句子表达内容。并未对考生的语言专业能力设定过高的门槛，所以在这一点上考生要更注意用词的准确和逻辑清晰能力。
托福综合写作技巧2：细分阅读布局，定位听力分段
在我们综合写作中这一技能也是十分必须的。不论是停顿时间还是表示顺序的连接词，或是代表语义转换的语气词等都是一个不错的判断分段的标志。可是毕竟因为只有一遍的听力机会，所以有些停顿甚至是连词都未必能完全听到，因为事先毫无征兆。在阅读浏览的过程中，考生不难发现每个段落都有一个关键词，考生要注意这些关键词的含义。
托福综合写作技巧3：精听主体首句，否则静候关系连词
一般难度不高的综合写作听力内容会在对应段落如约出现与阅读对应的中心理由，而这个中心理由也就是写作的得分点。可是现在不少难度高的听力内容并不会直接在每段的首句就亮明教授的反驳理由，而是说了一个相关的内容，混淆视听，增加难度。如果果真如此的话，考生也不需担心，因为我们可以通过其他的方法来等待到我们需要的反驳理由。而此时连接词的重要性就不可小觑了。
托福综合写作满分范文：
The lecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened in reality.
First, some members got free rides. That is, some didn’t work hard but got recognition for the success nontheless. This also indicates that people who worked hard were not given recognition they should have gotten. In other words, they weren’t given the opportunity to “shine”. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates.
Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are more responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower than individuals in decision making. Groups needed more time for meetings, which are necessary procedures in decision making. This was another place where experience contradicted theory.
Third, influential people might emerge and lead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are going in the right direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is nobody that has enough influence to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the leader, and might become less flexible in its thinking. They might become one-sided, and thus fail to succeed.